Europe’s e-commerce expansion is booming – but compliance remains the bottleneck
Europe’s e-commerce market is booming, but compliance slows expansion. Learn how the Merchant of Record model helps brands scale faster and stay compliant. (Ad)
Europe is one of the most attractive e-commerce markets in the world. High purchasing power, digital-savvy consumers, and a unified trade zone make it a logical target for global brands looking to scale. Yet for many US or APAC companies, the challenge is not demand—it’s compliance.
A brand may see strong traction in Germany, France, or the Netherlands, but quickly discovers that VAT rules, invoicing requirements, and consumer protection laws vary country by country. What looks like one market is actually a patchwork of local obligations. And for the teams responsible for expansion, that complexity creates real risk.
Why European expansion is operationally complex
Selling across borders in Europe means navigating a fragmented regulatory environment. VAT regimes differ not just in rates but in registration thresholds, filing frequencies, and reporting formats. A brand selling to five EU countries may need separate VAT registrations, different invoicing standards, and distinct return policies—even when selling the exact same product.
Consumer protection requirements add another layer. The EU grants customers rights around cancellation, refunds, and warranty that must be honored by the legal seller. For brands unfamiliar with these rules, non-compliance can lead to fines, blocked shipments, or reputational damage.
Managing this market by market puts significant strain on internal teams. Finance, legal, and operations must coordinate across time zones, languages, and local advisors. For many companies, this overhead delays launches or limits how many markets they can realistically enter.
The traditional ways brands handle compliance
Setting up local entities
The conventional route is to establish a legal entity in each target market. This provides full control but comes at a cost. Incorporating in Germany, for example, typically requires €25,000 in share capital for a GmbH, plus legal fees, notary costs, and ongoing accounting obligations. Multiply that across France, Spain, Italy, and the Netherlands, and the setup investment alone can exceed €150,000—before a single order is processed.
Beyond money, there is time. Registering for VAT, opening bank accounts, and aligning local processes can take three to six months per market. For brands under pressure to show results, that timeline often conflicts with commercial goals.
Managing compliance internally
Some brands choose to handle compliance without local entities by working with a network of tax advisors, payment providers, and logistics partners. This approach offers flexibility but creates fragmented responsibility. When VAT filings, invoicing, and customer refunds are split across multiple vendors, no single party owns the outcome. Mistakes become harder to trace, and internal teams spend more time coordinating than growing.
What is a Merchant of Record model?
A Merchant of Record (MoR) is an external entity that becomes the legal seller of a product to the end customer. Unlike a payment processor, which only handles transactions, the MoR takes on legal responsibility for the sale itself—including VAT collection, invoicing, and compliance with local consumer protection laws.
The brand retains operational control. Pricing, marketing, product selection, and logistics remain with the original company. But the legal and fiscal obligations shift to the MoR, who acts as the official vendor of record in each market.
| Responsibility | Brand | Merchant of Record |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing strategy | ✓ | |
| Marketing & branding | ✓ | |
| Product selection | ✓ | |
| Logistics coordination | ✓ | |
| VAT registration & filing | ✓ | |
| Invoicing to consumers | ✓ | |
| Consumer protection compliance | ✓ | |
| Transaction liability | ✓ |
What a Merchant of Record does not solve by default
A MoR is not a turnkey solution. Several areas still require active involvement from the brand:
- Integration work: Connecting e-commerce platforms, ERP systems, and payment flows to the MoR’s infrastructure takes time and technical resources.
- Process alignment: Order flows, inventory updates, and fulfillment triggers must be mapped clearly between both parties.
- Customer experience ownership: The brand remains responsible for how customers perceive the purchase—from product pages to post-purchase communication.
Brands should not assume that signing a MoR contract removes all operational complexity. The value lies in offloading specific legal and fiscal burdens, not in outsourcing the entire go-to-market effort.
When a Merchant of Record model can make sense
Speed of market entry
For brands that need to move fast, a MoR can dramatically reduce time to launch. Instead of spending months on entity setup, VAT registration, and local bank accounts, a brand can begin selling through a MoR within weeks. This is particularly valuable when testing new markets or responding to seasonal demand windows.
Resource constraints
Not every company has in-house legal, tax, or finance teams with European expertise. A MoR model allows brands with limited compliance capacity to enter new markets without hiring specialists or engaging multiple local advisors. Internal resources can stay focused on growth activities—product development, customer acquisition, and brand building—while the MoR handles regulatory obligations.
Key criteria when evaluating a Merchant of Record provider
Before selecting a MoR partner, brands should evaluate providers on concrete criteria rather than marketing claims:
- Market and country coverage: Does the provider support all target markets? Are there gaps in Southern or Eastern Europe?
- Scope of legal responsibility: What exactly does the MoR take on? VAT only, or also consumer protection, chargebacks, and transaction disputes?
- Handling of refunds and returns: How are cross-border returns processed? Who bears the cost, and how are refunds issued to customers?
- Customer obligations: Who handles customer service inquiries related to invoicing, cancellations, or warranty claims?
- Integration requirements: What technical work is needed? Does the provider offer APIs, connectors, or require custom development?
The answers to these questions will differ significantly between providers. Brands should request documentation and, where possible, reference customers in similar industries or markets.
How providers bundle MoR with additional services
Many MoR providers do not operate in isolation. Instead, they bundle legal seller services with related capabilities such as payment processing, logistics, and technology platforms. This bundling reflects the reality that compliance, fulfillment, and transaction handling are deeply connected.
Common service bundles include:
- Tech + MoR: Headless commerce platforms or checkout solutions that integrate MoR functionality directly into the purchase flow.
- Logistics + MoR: Fulfillment providers that combine warehousing and shipping with legal seller responsibility, creating a single point of contact for physical and fiscal operations.
- Payments + MoR: Payment service providers that extend their offering to include VAT handling and invoicing as part of the transaction layer.
Trade-offs to consider:
| Approach | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Bundled / all-in-one | Single vendor, simplified coordination, integrated data flows | Less flexibility, potential lock-in, may include services not needed |
| Modular / best-of-breed | Freedom to choose specialized providers, easier to switch components | More vendors to manage, integration complexity, fragmented responsibility |
For brands with limited internal capacity, a bundled approach can reduce coordination overhead. For those with strong technical teams and existing vendor relationships, a modular setup may offer more control.
Example: IDEAL GROUP’s all-in-one approach
IDEAL GROUP, a Germany-based e-commerce services company, positions its MoR offering as part of an integrated package that combines legal seller services with technology and logistics.
The company’s “IDEAL 360” headless commerce platform connects to existing brand systems and automates workflows from order management to payment handling. This integration layer is designed to reduce the technical lift typically required when onboarding a MoR provider.IDEAL GROUP backs this with operational infrastructure: over 53,000 square meters of logistics space, more than 600 employees, and capabilities spanning warehousing, shipping, customer service, and accounting. The company also offers marketplace management and marketing services, positioning itself as a single partner for brands that want to consolidate European operations.
How this fits into the broader MoR landscape:
IDEAL GROUP represents the bundled, full-service end of the spectrum. For brands that prefer to work with fewer vendors and value having logistics, compliance, and technology under one roof, this approach can simplify expansion. For those who already have strong fulfillment partnerships or prefer best-of-breed solutions, the all-in-one model may offer more than needed.
Final considerations for brands expanding into Europe
European e-commerce continues to grow, but the operational complexity of cross-border selling is growing with it. For brands evaluating expansion, the Merchant of Record model offers a way to reduce legal exposure and accelerate market entry—without the upfront investment of establishing local entities.
However, a MoR is not a one-size-fits-all solution. The right setup depends less on growth ambition and more on timing, internal resources, and risk tolerance.
Questions to guide the decision:
- How quickly do we need to be live in new markets?
- Do we have internal capacity to manage VAT, invoicing, and consumer compliance?
- Are we prepared for the integration work a MoR requires?
- Do we want a single bundled partner or a modular setup with specialized vendors?
The answers will point toward the right model—and the right provider—for each brand’s specific situation.
For more on IDEAL GROUP’s Merchant of Record service, visit: https://www.ideal-group.de/en/services/merchant-of-record/?mtm_campaign=E-Commerce-News-Germany
***
